Z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments. z-Tree is a widely used software package for developing and carrying out economic experiments. The language used to define the experiments is simple and compact, meaning that experiments can be developed quickly, and programming experience is not necessary, though useful. z-Tree is flexible both with respect to the logic of interaction and the visual representation, allowing the simple programming of normal form games, extensive form games, double auctions, or clock auctions, for example. We began the development of the software in 1998, and have continually added new features.

References in zbMATH (referenced in 269 articles )

Showing results 1 to 20 of 269.
Sorted by year (citations)

1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 next

  1. Bartling, Björn; Netzer, Nick: An externality-robust auction: theory and experimental evidence (2016)
  2. Bayer, Ralph-Christopher: Cooperation and distributive conflict (2016)
  3. Brown, Alexander L.; Velez, Rodrigo A.: The costs and benefits of symmetry in common-ownership allocation problems (2016)
  4. Camerer, Colin; Nunnari, Salvatore; Palfrey, Thomas R.: Quantal response and nonequilibrium beliefs explain overbidding in maximum-value auctions (2016)
  5. Cardella, Eric: Exploiting the guilt aversion of others: do agents do it and is it effective? (2016)
  6. Castillo, Marco; Dianat, Ahrash: Truncation strategies in two-sided matching markets: theory and experiment (2016)
  7. de Groot Ruiz, Adrian; Ramer, Roald; Schram, Arthur: Formal versus informal legislative bargaining (2016)
  8. Di Cagno, D.; Galliera, A.; Güth, W.; Pace, N.; Panaccione, L.: Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: an experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation (2016)
  9. Greiff, Matthias; Paetzel, Fabian: Second-order beliefs in reputation systems with endogenous evaluations -- an experimental study (2016)
  10. Großer, Jens; Seebauer, Michael: The curse of uninformed voting: an experimental study (2016)
  11. Hanaki, Nobuyuki; Jacquemet, Nicolas; Luchini, Stéphane; Zylbersztejn, Adam: Cognitive ability and the effect of strategic uncertainty (2016)
  12. Khalmetski, Kiryl: Testing guilt aversion with an exogenous shift in beliefs (2016)
  13. Korgin, N.A.; Korepanov, V.O.: An efficient solution of the resource allotment problem with the Groves-Ledyard mechanism under transferable utility (2016)
  14. Minozzi, William; Woon, Jonathan: Competition, preference uncertainty, and jamming: a strategic communication experiment (2016)
  15. Montero, Maria; Possajennikov, Alex; Sefton, Martin; Turocy, Theodore L.: Majoritarian Blotto contests with asymmetric battlefields: an experiment on apex games (2016)
  16. Robbett, Andrea: Community dynamics in the lab (2016)
  17. Spiekermann, Kai; Weiss, Arne: Objective and subjective compliance: a norm-based explanation of `moral wiggle room’ (2016)
  18. Asano, Takao; Okudaira, Hiroko; Sasaki, Masaru: An experimental test of a search model under ambiguity (2015)
  19. Banuri, Sheheryar; Eckel, Catherine: Cracking down on bribery (2015)
  20. Bradfield, Anthony J.; Kagel, John H.: Legislative bargaining with teams (2015)

1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 next