AFRA

AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks The issue of representing attacks to attacks in argumentation is receiving an increasing attention as a useful conceptual modelling tool in several contexts. In this paper we present AFRA, a formalism encompassing unlimited recursive attacks within argumentation frameworks. AFRA satisfies the basic requirements of definition simplicity and rigorous compatibility with Dung’s theory of argumentation. This paper provides a complete development of the AFRA formalism complemented by illustrative examples and a detailed comparison with other recursive attack formalizations.


References in zbMATH (referenced in 18 articles , 1 standard article )

Showing results 1 to 18 of 18.
Sorted by year (citations)

  1. Charwat, Günther; Dvořák, Wolfgang; Gaggl, Sarah A.; Wallner, Johannes P.; Woltran, Stefan: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey (2015)
  2. Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastian; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support (2015)
  3. Baroni, Pietro; Boella, Guido; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; van der Torre, Leendert; Villata, Serena: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks (2014)
  4. Cayrol, Claudette; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding (2013)
  5. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation (2012)
  6. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert; Hulstijn, Joris: A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks (2012)
  7. Amgoud, Leila; Devred, Caroline; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems (2011)
  8. Baroni, P.; Dunne, P.E.; Giacomin, M.: On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance (2011)
  9. Baroni, Pietro; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; Guida, Giovanni: AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks (2011)
  10. Dunne, Paul E.; Hunter, Anthony; McBurney, Peter; Parsons, Simon; Wooldridge, Michael: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results (2011)
  11. Dvořák, Wolfgang; Woltran, Stefan: On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics (2011)
  12. Gabbay, Dov M.: Dung’s argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger (2011)
  13. Gorogiannis, Nikos; Hunter, Anthony: Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties (2011)
  14. Hanh, D.D.; Dung, P.M.; Hung, N.D.; Thang, P.M.: Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation (2011)
  15. Modgil, Sanjay; Bench-Capon, Trevor J.M.: Metalevel argumentation (2011)
  16. Baroni, Pietro; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; Guida, Giovanni: Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks (2009)
  17. Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert; Villata, Serena: Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques (2009)
  18. Gabbay, Dov M.: Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview (2009)