AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks The issue of representing attacks to attacks in argumentation is receiving an increasing attention as a useful conceptual modelling tool in several contexts. In this paper we present AFRA, a formalism encompassing unlimited recursive attacks within argumentation frameworks. AFRA satisfies the basic requirements of definition simplicity and rigorous compatibility with Dung’s theory of argumentation. This paper provides a complete development of the AFRA formalism complemented by illustrative examples and a detailed comparison with other recursive attack formalizations.

References in zbMATH (referenced in 23 articles , 1 standard article )

Showing results 1 to 20 of 23.
Sorted by year (citations)

1 2 next

  1. Gottifredi, Sebastian; Cohen, Andrea; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations (2018)
  2. Gottifredi, Sebastian; Tamargo, Luciano H.; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems (2018)
  3. Polberg, Sylwia; Hunter, Anthony: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches (2018)
  4. Riveret, Régis; Baroni, Pietro; Gao, Yang; Governatori, Guido; Rotolo, Antonino; Sartor, Giovanni: A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation (2018)
  5. Hung, Nguyen Duy: Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation (2017)
  6. Charwat, Günther; Dvořák, Wolfgang; Gaggl, Sarah A.; Wallner, Johannes P.; Woltran, Stefan: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey (2015)
  7. Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastian; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support (2015)
  8. Baroni, Pietro; Boella, Guido; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; van der Torre, Leendert; Villata, Serena: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks (2014)
  9. Cayrol, Claudette; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding (2013)
  10. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation (2012)
  11. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert; Hulstijn, Joris: A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks (2012)
  12. Amgoud, Leila; Devred, Caroline; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems (2011)
  13. Baroni, P.; Dunne, P. E.; Giacomin, M.: On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance (2011)
  14. Baroni, Pietro; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; Guida, Giovanni: AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks (2011)
  15. Dunne, Paul E.; Hunter, Anthony; McBurney, Peter; Parsons, Simon; Wooldridge, Michael: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results (2011)
  16. Dvořák, Wolfgang; Woltran, Stefan: On the intertranslatability of argumentation semantics (2011)
  17. Gabbay, Dov M.: Dung’s argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger (2011)
  18. Gorogiannis, Nikos; Hunter, Anthony: Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties (2011)
  19. Hanh, D. D.; Dung, P. M.; Hung, N. D.; Thang, P. M.: Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation (2011)
  20. Modgil, Sanjay; Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M.: Metalevel argumentation (2011)

1 2 next