The Abella Interactive Theorem Prover (System Description). Abella [3] is an interactive system for reasoning about aspects of object languages that have been formally presented through recursive rules based on syntactic structure. Abella utilizes a two-level logic approach to specification and reasoning. One level is defined by a specification logic which supports a transparent encoding of structural semantics rules and also enables their execution. The second level, called the reasoning logic, embeds the specification logic and allows the development of proofs of properties about specifications. An important characteristic of both logics is that they exploit the λ-tree syntax approach to treating binding in object languages. Amongst other things, Abella has been used to prove normalizability properties of the λ-calculus, cut admissibility for a sequent calculus and type uniqueness and subject reduction properties. This paper discusses the logical foundations of Abella, outlines the style of theorem proving that it supports and finally describes some of its recent applications.

References in zbMATH (referenced in 39 articles , 2 standard articles )

Showing results 1 to 20 of 39.
Sorted by year (citations)

1 2 next

  1. Guidi, Ferruccio; Sacerdoti Coen, Claudio; Tassi, Enrico: Implementing type theory in higher order constraint logic programming (2019)
  2. Perera, Roly; Cheney, James: Proof-relevant (\pi)-calculus: a constructive account of concurrency and causality (2018)
  3. Rabe, Florian: A modular type reconstruction algorithm (2018)
  4. Zhao, Jinxu; Oliveira, Bruno C. d. S.; Schrijvers, Tom: Formalization of a polymorphic subtyping algorithm (2018)
  5. Chaudhuri, Kaustuv; Lima, Leonardo; Reis, Giselle: Formalized meta-theory of sequent calculi for substructural logics (2017)
  6. Cimini, Matteo; Siek, Jeremy G.: Automatically generating the dynamic semantics of gradually typed languages (2017)
  7. Miller, Dale: Proof checking and logic programming (2017)
  8. Serrano, Alejandro; Hage, Jurriaan: Constraint handling rules with binders, patterns and generic quantification (2017)
  9. Libal, Tomer; Miller, Dale: Functions-as-constructors higher-order unification (2016)
  10. Wang, Yuting; Nadathur, Gopalan: A higher-order abstract syntax approach to verified transformations on functional programs (2016)
  11. Felty, Amy P.; Momigliano, Alberto; Pientka, Brigitte: The next 700 challenge problems for reasoning with higher-order abstract syntax representations. II: A survey (2015)
  12. Miller, Dale: Proof checking and logic programming (2015)
  13. Olarte, Carlos; Pimentel, Elaine: Proving concurrent constraint programming correct, revisited (2015)
  14. Pientka, Brigitte; Cave, Andrew: Inductive Beluga: programming proofs (2015)
  15. Steen, Alexander; Benzmüller, Christoph: There is no best (\beta)-normalization strategy for higher-order reasoners (2015)
  16. Wisniewski, Max; Steen, Alexander; Benzmüller, Christoph: \textscLeoPARD-- a generic platform for the implementation of higher-order reasoners (2015)
  17. Baelde, David; Chaudhuri, Kaustuv; Gacek, Andrew; Miller, Dale; Nadathur, Gopalan; Tiu, Alwen; Wang, Yuting: Abella: a system for reasoning about relational specifications (2014)
  18. Southern, Mary; Chaudhuri, Kaustuv: A two-level logic approach to reasoning about typed specification languages (2014)
  19. Accattoli, Beniamino: Proof pearl: Abella formalization of (\lambda)-calculus cube property (2012)
  20. Cimini, Matteo; Mousavi, Mohamamdreza; Reniers, Michel A.; Gabbay, Murdoch J.: Nominal SOS (2012)

1 2 next